An example of the type of discussion banned at ATS can be found in the article "The Strange Tale of the “Sandy Hook Massacre”" (from page 4 of the Oct. 2014 issue of the Oklahoma publication The Banner) attributed to retired Brig. Gen. Ed Wheeler. In this article 27 questions are raised about what we have been told and shown of this event.
But on ATS, supposedly a conspiracy theory forum, "an indefinite moratorium" was placed "on all topics related to the massacre at Sandy Hook."
The member "Gltichy" shown speaking out against SepticOverlord above was then banned.
Another member asked Septic, "what is the point of this forum," if not to discuss things like this, to which Septic replied:
The action would not be unprecedented. We often remove new topics on the "No Planes" theory with regard to 9/11, and all known pre-existing threads on that subject are in the hoax forum.
Frankly, lately I loath visiting ATS for fear of another stupid Sandy Hook thread that is embarrassing to all those who seek to create smart topics on ATS.
Seriously... I'm close to losing faith.
One might assume that if Septic really is losing faith, then he's losing faith in the ability of this counter-intelligence project to keep an investigative public away from what is really happening in this country.
Yep. ATS is operated by the zio gatekeepers. Why would members not be allowed to talk about a conspiracy? That's because they are too close to the truth. ATS then acts like the subject matter is "so stupid" that they're afraid what people will think of the site if it is discussed. LOL puhlease. Does that sound right to you? I left that site long ago because I saw what was happening there. I called out a new member for spreading lies and propaganda and they temp-banned me and protected their little zio shill. I told the zio mod to stick it. ATS is a gatekeeper site where info is controlled.
ReplyDelete